Page 13 - Flipbook: Sociology Shortcuts Issue 5: Situational Action Theory
P. 13

The Study


       Wikstrom’s longitudinal study followed a randomly selected sample of 716
       young people, aged 12 – 16, living in and around the English city of
       Peterborough over a period of 13 years (roughly 2002 – 2015). One of the
       unique features of the study was that, in line with Wikstrom’s focus on the
       idea of situational action, it was interested in studying the participants as
       both individual actors (their sense of moral purpose in particular) and
       the social environments (situational settings) in which they lived and




































       General Findings: the crime paradox                                                                 THE CRIME PARADOX



       We referred earlier to the paradox at the heart of our understanding of
       youth crime, namely that while certain types of routine street crime are
       committed by socially-disadvantaged working class youth, social
       disadvantage is not, in itself, a simple cause of crime and criminality. Data
       from the Peterborough Study is instructive in this respect:


       •  Around one-third of the teenagers in the sample committed no crimes
       at all over the period of the study.

       •  The vast majority of teens committed a very small number of minor
       crimes – at most one or two a year – over the period in question.


       •  A small group, 4% of the sample, committed around 50% of the
       crime detailed in the study. This group were also responsible for the
       majority of the more-serious offences, such as burglary, robbery and car
       theft. This group also tended to commit a far wider range of crimes than
       their peers, indicative of a much greater level of commitment to
       criminality.






                                                                                                        13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18