Page 7 - Flipbook: Sociology Shortcuts Issue 5: Situational Action Theory
P. 7

SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE





       Although we’ll develop the (empirical) relationship between crime and
       social  in more detail later, it’s useful to understand two things to complete
       this section:



                                                       Firstly, although we’ve been at pains
                                                       to point-out social disadvantage
                                                       doesn’t directly cause crime, that’s
                                                       not to say it doesn’t have an
                                                       important role to play in our
                                                       understanding of those causes. We
                                                       know that concepts like personal
                                                       morality, self-control and peer-group
                                                       relationships are significantly
                                                       influenced by social advantages and                     DISADVANTAGE
                                                       disadvantages.
                                                       In terms of personal relationships we
                                                       know social class – a proxy for
                                                       different types of advantage and
                                                       disadvantage – plays an important,
                                                       probably determining, role in the
                                                       relationships we form: the socially
                                                       advantaged tend to mix with those of
                                                       a similar status and vice versa.
                                                       The implication here is that the
                                                       socially disadvantaged have a much
                                                       greater chance of forming personal
                                                       relationships with those involved in
                                                       crime than the socially advantaged:
                                                       the circles in which young working-
                                                       class move, for example, have a high
                                                       probability of bringing them into
                                                       contact with people for whom crime
                                                       is, if not necessarily a way of life, an
                                                       important aspect of that life.

                                                       This isn’t to say socially
                                                       disadvantaged teens inevitably
                                                       become offenders because it’s
                                                       perfectly possible to form non-
                                                       criminal relationships with similar-
                                                       minded peers. Compared to their
                                                       socially advantaged peers, however,
                                                       there’s a much greater probability
                                                       that at least some peer relationships
                                                       will involve criminal offending.









                                                                                                        07
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12